How to Use STRING_AGG() for Concatenating Rows into a Single Column in SQL Server

When working with SQL Server, you may encounter scenarios where you need to combine multiple row values into a single column. Prior to SQL Server 2017, this required using STUFF() with FOR XML PATH(), but now, the STRING_AGG() function provides a simpler approach.

What is STRING_AGG()?

The STRING_AGG() function concatenates values from multiple rows into a single string with a specified separator.

Basic Syntax:

SELECT STRING_AGG(column_name, ', ') AS concatenated_values
FROM table_name;
  • column_name: The column whose values you want to concatenate.
  • ', ': The separator used between values.

Example Usage

Consider a Customers table:

id name
1 Alice
2 Bob
3 Charlie

Using STRING_AGG(), we can concatenate the names:

SELECT STRING_AGG(name, ', ') AS customer_names
FROM Customers;

Result:

Alice, Bob, Charlie

Using STRING_AGG() with GROUP BY

You can also use STRING_AGG() within GROUP BY to aggregate data by a specific column. Consider an Orders table:

customer_id product
1 Laptop
1 Mouse
2 Keyboard
2 Monitor

To get a list of products purchased by each customer:

SELECT customer_id, STRING_AGG(product, ', ') AS purchased_products
FROM Orders
GROUP BY customer_id;

Result:

customer_id | purchased_products
------------|-------------------
1           | Laptop, Mouse
2           | Keyboard, Monitor

Sorting Values in STRING_AGG()

By default, STRING_AGG() does not guarantee an order. To enforce ordering, use WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY column_name). Example:

SELECT STRING_AGG(name, ', ') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY name) AS sorted_names
FROM Customers;

Key Benefits of STRING_AGG():

  • Eliminates complex workarounds like STUFF() with FOR XML PATH().
  • More readable and concise syntax.
  • Works efficiently with GROUP BY for aggregating related data.

STRING_AGG() is a powerful function that simplifies string concatenation in SQL Server, making queries cleaner and more efficient. Happy querying!

1
137

Related

In C#, you can format an integer with commas (thousands separator) using ToString with a format specifier.

int number = 1234567;
string formattedNumber = number.ToString("N0"); // "1,234,567"
Console.WriteLine(formattedNumber);

Explanation:

"N0": The "N" format specifier stands for Number, and "0" means no decimal places. The output depends on the culture settings, so in regions where , is the decimal separator, you might get 1.234.567.

Alternative:

You can also specify culture explicitly if you need a specific format:

using System.Globalization;

int number = 1234567;
string formattedNumber = number.ToString("N0", CultureInfo.InvariantCulture);
Console.WriteLine(formattedNumber); // "1,234,567"
4
443

Slow initial load times can drive users away from your React application. One powerful technique to improve performance is lazy loading - loading components only when they're needed.

Let's explore how to implement this in React.

The Problem with Eager Loading

By default, React bundles all your components together, forcing users to download everything upfront. This makes navigation much quicker and more streamlined once this initial download is complete.

However, depending on the size of your application, it could also create a long initial load time.

import HeavyComponent from './HeavyComponent';
import AnotherHeavyComponent from './AnotherHeavyComponent';

function App() {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* These components load even if user never sees them */}
      <HeavyComponent />
      <AnotherHeavyComponent />
    </div>
  );
}

React.lazy() to the Rescue

React.lazy() lets you defer loading components until they're actually needed:

import React, { lazy, Suspense } from 'react';

// Components are now loaded only when rendered
const HeavyComponent = lazy(() => import('./HeavyComponent'));
const AnotherHeavyComponent = lazy(() => import('./AnotherHeavyComponent'));

function App() {
  return (
    <div>
      <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
        <HeavyComponent />
        <AnotherHeavyComponent />
      </Suspense>
    </div>
  );
}

Route-Based Lazy Loading

Combine with React Router for even better performance:

import React, { lazy, Suspense } from 'react';
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route } from 'react-router-dom';

const Home = lazy(() => import('./pages/Home'));
const Dashboard = lazy(() => import('./pages/Dashboard'));
const Settings = lazy(() => import('./pages/Settings'));

function App() {
  return (
    <BrowserRouter>
      <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
        <Routes>
          <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
          <Route path="/dashboard" element={<Dashboard />} />
          <Route path="/settings" element={<Settings />} />
        </Routes>
      </Suspense>
    </BrowserRouter>
  );
}

Implement these techniques in your React application today and watch your load times improve dramatically!

1
104

Closing a SqlDataReader correctly prevents memory leaks, connection issues, and unclosed resources. Here’s the best way to do it.

Use 'using' to Auto-Close

Using using statements ensures SqlDataReader and SqlConnection are closed even if an exception occurs.

Example

using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(connectionString))
{
    conn.Open();
    using (SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM Users", conn))
    using (SqlDataReader reader = cmd.ExecuteReader())
    {
        while (reader.Read())
        {
            Console.WriteLine(reader["Username"]);
        }
    } // ✅ Auto-closes reader here
} // ✅ Auto-closes connection here

This approach auto-closes resources when done and it is cleaner and less error-prone than manual closing.

⚡ Alternative: Manually Close in finally Block

If you need explicit control, you can manually close it inside a finally block.

SqlDataReader? reader = null;
try
{
    using SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(connectionString);
    conn.Open();
    using SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM Users", conn);
    reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();

    while (reader.Read())
    {
        Console.WriteLine(reader["Username"]);
    }
}
finally
{
    reader?.Close();  // ✅ Closes reader if it was opened
}

This is slightly more error prone if you forget to add a finally block. But might make sense when you need to handle the reader separately from the command or connection.

1
170