How to Use is and as Keywords for Type Checking in C#

Slow initial load times can drive users away from your React application. One powerful technique to improve performance is lazy loading - loading components only when they're needed.

Let's explore how to implement this in React.

The Problem with Eager Loading

By default, React bundles all your components together, forcing users to download everything upfront. This makes navigation much quicker and more streamlined once this initial download is complete.

However, depending on the size of your application, it could also create a long initial load time.

import HeavyComponent from './HeavyComponent';
import AnotherHeavyComponent from './AnotherHeavyComponent';

function App() {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* These components load even if user never sees them */}
      <HeavyComponent />
      <AnotherHeavyComponent />
    </div>
  );
}

React.lazy() to the Rescue

React.lazy() lets you defer loading components until they're actually needed:

import React, { lazy, Suspense } from 'react';

// Components are now loaded only when rendered
const HeavyComponent = lazy(() => import('./HeavyComponent'));
const AnotherHeavyComponent = lazy(() => import('./AnotherHeavyComponent'));

function App() {
  return (
    <div>
      <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
        <HeavyComponent />
        <AnotherHeavyComponent />
      </Suspense>
    </div>
  );
}

Route-Based Lazy Loading

Combine with React Router for even better performance:

import React, { lazy, Suspense } from 'react';
import { BrowserRouter, Routes, Route } from 'react-router-dom';

const Home = lazy(() => import('./pages/Home'));
const Dashboard = lazy(() => import('./pages/Dashboard'));
const Settings = lazy(() => import('./pages/Settings'));

function App() {
  return (
    <BrowserRouter>
      <Suspense fallback={<div>Loading...</div>}>
        <Routes>
          <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
          <Route path="/dashboard" element={<Dashboard />} />
          <Route path="/settings" element={<Settings />} />
        </Routes>
      </Suspense>
    </BrowserRouter>
  );
}

Implement these techniques in your React application today and watch your load times improve dramatically!

Raw string literals in C# provide a flexible way to work with multiline strings, with some interesting rules around how quotes work.

The key insight is that you can use any number of double quotes (three or more) to delimit your string, as long as the opening and closing sequences have the same number of quotes.

The Basic Rules

1. You must use at least three double quotes (""") to start and end a raw string literal
2. The opening and closing quotes must have the same count
3. The closing quotes must be on their own line for proper indentation
4. If your string content contains a sequence of double quotes, you need to use more quotes in your delimiter than the longest sequence in your content

Examples with Different Quote Counts

// Three quotes - most common usage
string basic = """
    This is a basic
    multiline string
    """;

// Four quotes - when your content has three quotes
string withThreeQuotes = """"
    Here's some text with """quoted""" content
    """";

// Five quotes - when your content has four quotes
string withFourQuotes = """""
    Here's text with """"nested"""" quotes
    """"";

// Six quotes - for even more complex scenarios
string withFiveQuotes = """"""
    Look at these """""nested""""" quotes!
    """""";

The N+1 Rule

The general rule is that if your string content contains N consecutive double quotes, you need to wrap the entire string with at least N+1 quotes. This ensures the compiler can properly distinguish between your content and the string's delimiters.

// Example demonstrating the N+1 rule
string example1 = """
    No quotes inside
    """; // 3 quotes is fine

string example2 = """"
    Contains """three quotes"""
    """"; // Needs 4 quotes (3+1)

string example3 = """""
    Has """"four quotes""""
    """""; // Needs 5 quotes (4+1)

Practical Tips

• Start with three quotes (""") as your default
• Only increase the quote count when you actually need to embed quote sequences in your content
• The closing quotes must be on their own line and should line up with the indentation you want
• Any whitespace to the left of the closing quotes defines the baseline indentation

// Indentation example
string properlyIndented = """
    {
        "property": "value",
        "nested": {
            "deeper": "content"
        }
    }
    """; // This line's position determines the indentation

This flexibility with quote counts makes raw string literals extremely versatile, especially when dealing with content that itself contains quotes, like JSON, XML, or other structured text formats.

Removing duplicates from a list in C# is a common task, especially when working with large datasets. C# provides multiple ways to achieve this efficiently, leveraging built-in collections and LINQ.

Using HashSet (Fastest for Unique Elements)

A HashSet<T> automatically removes duplicates since it only stores unique values. This is one of the fastest methods:

List<int> numbers = new List<int> { 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5 };
numbers = new HashSet<int>(numbers).ToList();
Console.WriteLine(string.Join(", ", numbers)); // Output: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Using LINQ Distinct (Concise and Readable)

LINQ’s Distinct() method provides an elegant way to remove duplicates:

List<int> numbers = new List<int> { 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5 };
numbers = numbers.Distinct().ToList();
Console.WriteLine(string.Join(", ", numbers)); // Output: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Removing Duplicates by Custom Property (For Complex Objects)

When working with objects, DistinctBy() from .NET 6+ simplifies duplicate removal based on a property:

using System.Linq;
using System.Collections.Generic;

class Person
{
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public int Age { get; set; }
}

List<Person> people = new List<Person>
{
    new Person { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 },
    new Person { Name = "Bob", Age = 25 },
    new Person { Name = "Alice", Age = 30 }
};

people = people.DistinctBy(p => p.Name).ToList();
Console.WriteLine(string.Join(", ", people.Select(p => p.Name))); // Output: Alice, Bob

For earlier .NET versions, use GroupBy():

people = people.GroupBy(p => p.Name).Select(g => g.First()).ToList();

Performance Considerations

• HashSet<T> is the fastest but only works for simple types.
• Distinct() is easy to use but slower than HashSet<T> for large lists.
• DistinctBy() (or GroupBy()) is useful for complex objects but may have performance trade-offs.

Conclusion

Choosing the best approach depends on the data type and use case. HashSet<T> is ideal for primitive types, Distinct() is simple and readable, and DistinctBy() (or GroupBy()) is effective for objects.